Therefore, the fit was dismissed since the plaintiff had not succeeded in proving which the present was, in fact, a sale. Onus of Proof: The court emphasized that the onus to show the genuineness in the reward was upon the beneficiary (plaintiff). If the present was denied, this problem could https://illegalencroachmentslawye58541.bloguetechno.com/examine-this-report-on-title-and-ownership-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me-66507911